Remember “Ida,” the missing link that wasn’t? In a Nature letter, scientists attack the lofty claims that surrounded the announcement of the fossil primate. Research head Erik Seiffert, an anatomist/paleontologist at Stony Brook University, explained, “The suggestion that Ida [was] . . . specifically related to the higher primates, namely monkeys apes and humans, was actually a minority view from the start. So it came as a surprise to many of us who are studying primate paleontology.”

We’ve reported on “Ida” a few times already and don’t need to change our tune. See Ida (Darwinius masillae): the Missing Link at Last? Ida (Darwinius masillae): the Real Story of this “Scientific Breakthrough”, News to Note, May 23, 2009, News to Note, May 30, 2009 , and Feedback: Digging up Dirt on Ida?

For the full story on the recent findings, please check back for tomorrow’s edition of News to Note.

Help keep these daily articles coming. Support AiG.