Several popular Christians don’t seem to think it really matters who wrote Genesis.

It may sound like an innocent question, but it’s not. This question reflects a common motivation: a desire to defend humanistic views that are based on evolution, even if it means denying that Genesis is real history written by Moses.

This question reflects a desire to accommodate humanistic views that are based on evolution.

Are you prepared to expose the disastrous problems with this claim?

The new book The Evolution of Adam is just the latest example of this old error, which keeps cropping up. Besides arguing against the literal historical creation of Adam as described in Genesis, the author, Dr. Peter Enns, denies that Moses wrote the first five books of the Bible (the Pentateuch).

In making this claim, the author realizes that he must somehow explain Christ’s statement: “For if you believed Moses, you would believe Me; for he wrote about Me” (John 5:46). In attempting to defend his views despite this verse, he writes, “Jesus here reflects the tradition that he himself inherited as a first-century Jew and that his hearers assumed to be the case.”1 In other words, Jesus accommodated his teaching to suit the erroneous thinking of His day.

A popular view among liberal theologians since the eighteenth century is that Jesus accommodated the beliefs of His time and incorporated them into His teaching. The accommodation theory posits that He knew the belief was wrong, but didn’t bother to deal with it because it would have been a distraction in His quest to save us from our sins. A related view, the limitation theory, states that Jesus was limited in His understanding to the degree that He unwittingly taught error.2

The consequences of these ideas are catastrophic. If Jesus knowingly taught error, then He lied. If He unwittingly taught error, then He was a false teacher. Either way, this position makes Jesus a sinner and less than God. If He sinned, then Jesus could not die on the Cross for our sins, because He would have needed to die for His own sins. Furthermore, charging Jesus with error means that the Father was also in error, since Jesus said that He only spoke the things the Father taught Him (John 8:28).

So who is correct: Jesus or the theologians who reject that Moses authored the Pentateuch? Obviously, God was there when Moses wrote these books, and He is the One who inspired Moses to write them (2 Timothy 3:16). This is yet another example of the tragic results of compromising God’s Word with the fallible and ever-changing ideas of man.

Tim Chaffey holds a master of divinity in apologetics and theology and a ThM in church history and theology from Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary. He is a writer/editor for Answers in Genesis’s web department. Tim has authored or coauthored several books, including Old-Earth Creationism on Trial and The Truth Chronicles series.

Help keep these daily articles coming. Support AiG.

Risk-free trial issue!

Risk-free trial issue!

If you decide you want to keep Answers coming, simply pay your invoice for just $24 and receive four issues (a full year) more. If not, write “cancel” across the invoice and return it. The trial issue is yours to keep, regardless!

Please allow 4-6 weeks for delivery.
New subscribers only. No gift subscriptions.
Offer valid in U.S. only.

Footnotes

  1. Peter Enns, The Evolution of Adam: What the Bible Does and Doesn’t Say about Human Origins (Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos Press, 2012), p. 153. Back
  2. For more on the accommodation and limitation theories, see www.answersingenesis.org/articles/2012/01/30/peter-enns-jesus-was-wrong Back