Evolution: The existence of all religions is understood as a developmental process, starting from a simple polytheism, monotheism (Judaism, Christianity, and Islam) eventually emerged.
Scientific Objections: On the one hand, the transfer of evolutionary concepts to the origin of religions was quite arbitrary, but on the other hand, it follows logically from the principles of evolution (compare the basic evolutionary assumption E2). There are no historical grounds for this presupposition. The application of evolutionary ideas to the Bible is in complete contrast with biblical doctrines, and has rather grave implications:
Lutz von Padberg maintains [P1, p. 44]: “From the biblical perspective it is a false doctrine to assign ‘another special way of salvation’ to other religions, because they are anti-Christian by nature and purpose. . . . Man’s resistance to the biblical affirmation that he is human and therefore cannot be a godlike superman (compare Gen. 3:22) leads to a perversion of the biblical distinction between God and man. Man will not acknowledge the truth of the Creator, and thus simply turns the creation account upside-down, perverting it in the true sense of the word: He does not want to be God’s image, but turns God into man’s image. That is the origin of religions which consequently contain many gap fillers borrowed from the Christian faith, exactly because they are based on ‘
what may be known about God’ as mentioned by Paul in Romans 1:19.”
The Bible: All people have three fundamental types of information at their disposal, given them at creation according to the Bible:
Man’s inventiveness was extraordinarily moved by this universal knowledge, leading to thousands of peculiar ways in the form of various religions. The distinction between man’s religious way and God’s way already became clear with Cain and Abel. Cain was the first person who wanted to serve God according to his own ideas; he thus became the founder of the first religion. Cain did not at all practice polytheism as envisioned by evolutionists for the first religion. His brother acted according to God’s will and is held up as an example of having a faith that pleases God (Heb. 11:4). Our chain of faith reaches back through Abraham, Noah, and Enoch, and all the way back to the first man. This illustrates the fact that God-pleasing faith was present right from the very beginning (monotheism, therefore, did not evolve), and other religions arose concurrently, being mere human constructs. Although Cain addressed the God of the Bible by his offering, it was frowned upon and not accepted in grace (Gen. 4:5). It thus becomes very clear that all religions which do not pay homage to the Father of Jesus Christ, are denounced by God as idolatry and witchcraft (Lev. 26:1; Ps. 31:7; Jer. 10:14–15; 2 Cor. 6:16). From time to time, the idea that adherents of other religions are also finding their way to God, is advocated, but it is unambiguously and emphatically rejected by the Bible: “
For all the gods of the nations are idols” (Ps. 96:5), and “
No . . . idolater—has any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and of God” (Eph. 5:5). The decisive distinction between the origin of biblical faith (God-given) and the religions (contrived by man) has crucial consequences: While God’s way brings eternal salvation, the religions obstruct the way to redemption (see [G4] for a more detailed discussion).
Help keep these daily articles coming. Support AiG.
“Is creation a viable model of origins in today’s modern scientific era?” This DVD features Bill Nye and Ken Ham debating one of the biggest questions concerning the scientific community today.