Answers magazine is the Bible-affirming, creation-based magazine from Answers in Genesis. In it you will find fascinating content and stunning photographs that present creation and worldview articles along with relevant cultural topics from different authors. Each quarterly issue includes a detachable chart, a pullout children’s magazine, a unique animal highlight, excellent layman and semi-technical articles plus bonus content from the AnswersMagazine.com website. Our purpose is to equip you, our reader, with practical answers so you can confidently communicate the gospel and biblical authority with accuracy. Why wait? Subscribe today!
Creation Archive > Volume 14 Issue 3 > The 'oldest known fly'—a lesson in caution
First published: Creation 14(3):6 June 1992 | ||
Evolutionists generally believe that insects with two wings have evolved from the ‘more primitive’ or ‘unspecialized’ four-winged condition. If pressed for evidence, they would generally refer to the fossil of ‘the oldest known fly’—a specimen called Permotipula.
Though not quite as
widely known as
other alleged ‘links’, Permotipula has nevertheless achieved
quite a status as a
definite ‘in-between form’. It was discovered in Australia more than
50 years
ago.1 However, all that it consisted of was a single wing,
which was subsequently lost. Its name comes from the fact that it was found in
Permian rock and was believed to be comparable to the wing of the familiar dipterous
(two-winged)
craneflies Tipulidae. In subsequent works dealing with the evolution of
insects,2,3 we find quotations
referring to Permotipula—yet this one
fossil wing has curiously ‘metamorphosed’ in the literature into
the remains of an insect with four wings. Thus, it became enshrined as a four-winged
ancestor of the two-winged flies
and midges of modern times (Diptera).
However, the fossil has heen rediscovered —in the British Museum. A fresh study of the wing venation (the arrangement of veins) has shown that one character which was believed to be indicative of a close relalionship to the Diptera is absent, and that ‘Permotipula cannot be one of the direct ancestors of the recent Diptera’.4 Not only that, but it is of course painfully obvious that a single wing cannot, in any case, be trumpeted as proof that its owner had four.
All this goes to show how cautious one must be whenever a discovery of an ‘unspecialized ancestor’ of some animal or plant is hailed in the literature.
Help keep these daily articles coming. Find out how to support AiG.