Donate

Answers Magazine

Answers Magazine

Answers magazine is the Bible-affirming, creation-based magazine from Answers in Genesis. In it you will find fascinating content and stunning photographs that present creation and worldview articles along with relevant cultural topics from different authors. Each quarterly issue includes a detachable chart, a pullout children’s magazine, a unique animal highlight, excellent layman and semi-technical articles plus bonus content from the AnswersMagazine.com website. Our purpose is to equip you, our reader, with practical answers so you can confidently communicate the gospel and biblical authority with accuracy. Why wait? Subscribe today!


Not so Independent minded!

British newspaper slams AiG!

March 28, 2000

The British newspaper the Independent took the evolutionary party line when it profiled Answers in Genesis on Sunday, March 26 with a major, rather negative, article. It appeared after an 8-day speaking tour of England and Wales by AiG executive director Ken Ham.

This London paper highlighted the influence that AiG has had in America, and also in Great Britain through its affiliate ministry based in Leicester. The newspaper chose to take an alarmist view of AiG’s impact, and therefore overstated the influence of AiG (and we chose not to be flattered). For example:

Refute the current arguments for evolution!

Refuting EvolutionRefuting Evolution
Dr Jonathan Sarfati


A general critique of the most up-to-date arguments for evolution to challenge educators, students, and parents. Thus it provides a good summary of the arguments against evolution and for creation. It also exposes the flat earth myth and corrects misinformation about the Galileo affair. (High School–Adult) See review

ORDER YOUR COPY TODAY

  • AiG was given credit for many of the inroads made in Kansas, Kentucky, and Oklahoma to downplay the teaching of evolution in their public schools, when AiG actually was not involved in these efforts. Some of the school board members did read AiG’s book Refuting Evolution, which was presented to them by concerned Kansans, but that was the extent of AiG’s “involvement.” (See the new book The Kansas Tornado for the real story.)

  • In the case of Kansas, the paper incorrectly reported that “Kansas agreed to delete the teaching of the theory of evolution from its school curriculum.” This was printed despite AiG carefully pointing out to the reporter that evolution remains in the science standards approved by Kansas last August.

  • AiG does not receive “at least 10 invitations a day to lecture at secular colleges,” as was reported in an alarming tone. Actually, there may be days when AiG receives 10 invitations to lecture, but they generally come from churches and only from an occasional university (we would like to receive more university invitations, however, such as the one that came from Harvard last November).

  • The Independent claimed that “the fact that Darwin is part of the science curriculum in British schools horrifies Ham.” While AiG is certainly concerned that evolution is being taught as fact in most British schools, we are not in favor of eliminating it from the curriculum. AiG believes that students should be exposed to the teachings of evolution; it is, after all, such a prevalent worldview today. But we also argue that students should be exposed to the scientific problems with macro-evolution and be aware of alternative views in this question of life’s origins.

  • The paper claims that AiG is “planning to rival Disney” in building a major creation museum in the Cincinnati area (it is mockingly referred to as a “theme park” and its future exhibits are called “kitsch”). AiG has no such grandiose plans (and this will certainly be no amusement park!). Even one ride at a Disney theme park can easily cost more to build than it would to construct the entire AiG museum!

These exaggerated claims were obviously intended to frighten readers into believing that AiG has the clout to take evolution out of schools and to threaten “serious science.” The article also resorted to mocking creationists, calling Ken Ham “the high priest of Creationism.” It even made fun of his “lurid” dinosaur tie and polyester trousers, and also wrote of his “steely blue” eyes narrowing into “slits” as he spoke.

Listen to Ken Ham’s audio report on the British tour!

To listen to this broadcast you will need RealPlayer. If this program is not installed on your computer, you may download it free!

One would have thought that a paper called Independent would have endeavored to take a fresher approach in its reporting on the creation/evolution controversy. Instead, it resorted to the same tired arguments and mocking so typical of the secular press today.

To listen to Ken Ham’s report to the entire AiG staff (recorded Monday, March 27) about his British tour click here.

For Ken’s summary of his live TV debate against three evolutionists on Britain’s BBC-TV, click here.

Help keep these daily articles coming. Find out how to support AiG.