Answers Magazine

Answers Magazine

Answers magazine is the Bible-affirming, creation-based magazine from Answers in Genesis. In it you will find fascinating content and stunning photographs that present creation and worldview articles along with relevant cultural topics from different authors. Each quarterly issue includes a detachable chart, a pullout children’s magazine, a unique animal highlight, excellent layman and semi-technical articles plus bonus content from the AnswersMagazine.com website. Our purpose is to equip you, our reader, with practical answers so you can confidently communicate the gospel and biblical authority with accuracy. Why wait? Subscribe today!

‘Intelligent design’ whimpers out in Ohio

by Michael Matthews, AiG-US

11 December 2002

After a year of hype, evolution still dominates the new science standards in Ohio, USA, and—at the last minute—‘intelligent design’ was excluded by name from the standards.  The Ohio Board of Education unanimously approved the final guidelines yesterday, 10 December.

Refute the latest arguments for evolution

Refuting Evolution 2Refuting Evolution 2
Dr Jonathan Sarfati, with Mike Matthews


Evolutionists are on the attack. Are you prepared to refute the best that today's evolutionists have to offer? Respected AiG scientist Dr Jonathan Sarfati, author of the best-seller Refuting Evolution, has written a sequel that refutes the latest arguments to support evolution (as presented by PBS and Scientific American). Read world-leading evolutionists in their own words, and then find straightforward answers from science and the Bible. Refuting Evolution 2 will prepare you to answer the best arguments thrown at you by peers, teachers, neighbors and skeptics.

ORDER YOUR COPY TODAY

Supporters of intelligent design (the belief that a supernatural designer made the universe) had been holding a glimmer of hope.  At its meeting on 15 October, the board had added a provocative amendment: students should be able to ‘describe how scientists continue to investigate and critically analyze aspects of evolutionary theory.’  Many proponents of intelligent design saw this as a victory in their campaign to let teachers ‘teach the controversy.’ 

To eliminate any such misunderstanding about the intent of the amendment, however, the board decided to add a new disclaimer: ‘The intent of this indicator does not mandate the teaching or testing of Intelligent Design.’  

The word games are finally over.  Just as we suspected, the highly politicized school board—under intense pressure from the evolution lobby—lacked the courage to stand up for the freedom of teachers to deal honestly and openly with the controversies about origins and the serious weaknesses of evolution.  (For the full history of the Ohio controversy, see Vote on evolution next Monday and Vote in Ohio stirs evolution controversy.)

Technically, local school districts in Ohio are still free to decide how to handle intelligent design.  However, students must still take the state tests that are based on the state standards.  So one can presume that the local schools will bow to the new state standards.

Thus, the latest challenge to ‘big bang’ evolution in US schools has gone out with a whimper.

Help keep these daily articles coming. Find out how to support AiG.