Stuck on pause in Georgia

May 26, 2006

In a tentative victory for academic freedom in America’s public schools, a federal court yesterday sent back a lower court’s order that Cobb County, Georgia, schools remove textbook stickers that called evolution “a theory, not a fact.” A U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, although not rendering a final decision itself on the sticker’s constitutionality, ordered that the previous decision be vacated and the case retried.¹

In January 2005, the suburban Atlanta school system was ordered by a U.S. District Court judge to remove stickers from the inside front cover of tens of thousands of biology textbooks (see the wording in the sidebar to the right). The judge argued that because the sticker questioned evolution, it “appears to be endorsing the well-known prevailing alternative theory, creationism,” and was therefore unconstitutional. The stickers were eventually removed (see our previous story, The sticker didn’t stick (or did it?)).

The 11th Circuit Court wrote that “some key findings of the district court are not supported by the evidence that is contained in the record.” Thus the case is remanded “to the district court in order for it to conduct new evidentiary proceedings and enter a new set of findings based on evidence in a record that we will be able to review. … [I]n this area of the law [i.e., the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment], the devil is in the details” (pp. 3–4).

Although the lack of evidence was the largest problem the Circuit Court of Appeals had with the judge’s ruling, there was also the Circuit Court’s comment that in the new trial, “it would be helpful if the court issued an entirely new set of findings of fact and conclusions of law,” suggesting that there was more than a technicality involved in why this case was remanded. In fact, the federal court listed 18 questions that the district court should consider when it deliberates the case again. (For the moment, it appears that the stickers will not be reapplied inside the textbooks.)

The sticker issue is far more important than how it affects one school district in America. If future federal courts re-trying this case also decide that such an evolutionary-questioning disclaimer is an establishment of religion (thus held to be in violation of the First Amendment), then any law that has any perceived religious basis may be subject to a challenge in the courts.

We have come to a point in American history when the creation movement is having so much success in showing people that there are grave problems with molecules-to-man evolution that some secularists want the courts and legislatures to protect it. The Cobb case is exposing this agenda. At the same time, it has ironically demonstrated that indeed there is a fight over a religious worldview in America’s science classes: a concerted attempt by evolutionary humanists to proclaim and defend their belief system against any comers.

Notes

1. A PDF of the Circuit Court’s ruling yesterday can be read (courtesy of the Alliance Defense Fund) at http://www.telladf.org/UserDocs/CobbCountyDecision.pdf. Return to text.

Recommended resources

War of the Worldviews What do aliens, dinosaurs and gay marriage have in common? Discover the connection, and how to respond, in this amazing book from Answers in Genesis.

Battle for Truth (The) Only available while supplies last! In this engaging book you’ll find an easy-to-read summary of the worldviews that challenge traditional Christian values, as well as the resources you need to develop a better understanding of the biblical perspective.

Inherently Wind: A Hollywood History of the Scopes Trial In one of his most popular talks, Dr. Menton exposes the distortions and inaccuracies in the play and movie Inherit the Wind. This influential propaganda piece has deceived a whole generation …

Help keep these daily articles coming. Find out how to support AiG.