The trouble with sequencing

A preliminary comment by Dr. Georgia Purdom, AiG–USA

November 22, 2006

The news has been buzzing lately about two recent papers, one in Nature¹ and one in Science,² that are reporting the sequencing of up to one million bases of the Neandertal genome.

The recent papers focus on the sequencing of nuclear DNA rather than mtDNA, which will be discussed in another article on this website soon. The nuclear DNA was obtained from a bone sample of a Neandertal found in Croatia.¹ One of the major problems facing the sequencing of ancient DNA is contamination, from microbes as well as from those handling the fossils. Since Neandertals and modern humans are so closely related, it becomes difficult to discern what DNA is Neandertal and what is from modern humans. The researchers used Neandertal mtDNA to help determine which bone had the least amount of contamination from human DNA.¹ However, what is being used as Neandertal mtDNA may actually be modern human mtDNA! Therefore, it makes it difficult to know if Neandertal nuclear DNA is truly being sequenced.

Both papers seem to agree that the differences between Neandertal and modern human DNA are very small; probably 99.5–99.8% similar (though this is, of course, based on a very small fraction of the Neandertal genome). Where there are differences they think many of these may be due to base damage in the ancient DNA and sequencing errors. If this is the case it should be very difficult to accept that Neandertals are a separate species from humans.

The papers disagree as to whether Neandertals and humans interbred. The Nature paper suggests that interbreeding may have taken place, while the Science paper says interbreeding did not take place. Same evidence, different interpretation!

The papers also claim that humans and Neandertals diverged (each becoming separate species) about 500,000 years ago. Again, this is based on many assumptions about the past for which there is no evidence. For example, the Science paper says:

We assumed that Neandertals and modern humans evolved from a single ancestral population of 10,000 individuals and the Neandertal population split away from the human ancestral population instantaneously at a time T in the past, with no subsequent gene flow. [emphasis added]

How do they know? Were they there? Obviously, the answers to those questions are “They don’t” and “No.” Fortunately, we do have the eyewitness account of God as given to us in Genesis. God only made two humans, Adam and Eve, and so Neandertals (which were clearly human, as discussed in many of our articles) are descendants of them.

References

1. Green, Richard, et al., “Analysis of one million base pairs of Neanderthal DNA,” Nature, 444:330–336, 2006.
2. Noonan, James, et al., “Sequencing and analysis of Neanderthal genomic DNA,” Science, 314:1113–1118, 2006.

Help keep these daily articles coming. Find out how to support AiG.