A: According to Charles Darwin, the central mechanism of evolution is survival of the fittest. In this concept, inferior animals are more likely to become extinct while the superior ones are more likely to thrive. The racism that this idea has produced has now been both well-documented and widely publicized. Less widely known is the fact that many evolutionists, including Darwin, taught that women were both biologically and intellectually inferior to men.

According to Darwinian theory, women were less evolved than men, and because of their smaller brains, they were “eternally primitive,” childlike, less spiritual, more materialistic, and “a real danger to contemporary civilization.” The supposed intelligence gap that many leading Darwinists believed existed between human males and females was so large that some leading Darwinists classified them as two distinct species—males as Homo frontalis and females as Homo parietalis. The differences were so great that Darwin was amazed “such different beings belong to the same species.”

Reasons for male superiority included the conclusion that war and hunting pruned the weaker men, allowing only the most fit to return home and reproduce. Women, in contrast, were not subject to these selection pressures but were protected by men, allowing the weak to survive.

Many Darwin biographers, including Peter Brent and Evelleen Richards, conclude that Darwin had a low opinion of women. Brent concluded, “It would be hard to conceive of a more self-indulgent, almost contemptuous, view of the subservience of women to men” than Darwin’s attitude.

To find out more, see Darwin Taught Male Superiority.

Don’t miss your opportunity to be a part of Answers Education Online courses! Two new classes will be starting in just a few weeks, but the registration deadlines are drawing near.

APO 101, “Foundations in Creation Apologetics,” is a 12-week course aimed at giving you a solid foundation for defending your faith.

APO 203, “Creation Apologetics and Geology,” is a 6-week course that dives deeper into the biblical understanding of geology and how the idea of millions of years has influenced scientific thought.

To learn more about these courses visit our Answers Education page.

All wet: NASA’s Phoenix lander has identified water in a soil sample collected from Mars—no small source of excitement for those who proclaim “where there’s water, there’s life.” Read more.

Tissue issue: Not so fast! The much-publicized soft tissue found inside a T. rex thigh bone (supposedly millions of years old) may not be dinosaur protein after all, if the research of a University of Washington scientist is correct. Should we toss out yesterday’s “facts”? Read more.

Also: our diamond life, a Titan of a find, the nerve to fly, suiting up in fish, and finding the lost. Read more.

• Darwin DVD
• Securing of a New Developer
• Ken Ham’s India Videos
• Safety & Training
• Renovations to Planned Giving Website

• The center of the earth—where is it?
• The days in Genesis—why such a battle?
• Fossils—are they past or present?
• Genesis or evolution—the facts are the same!
• Genesis or evolution—the science is the same!