In this issue . . .
Q: Does Ken Ham commit logical fallacies?
A: After watching Jason Lisle’s Ultimate Apologetics DVD set, a supporter of Answers in Genesis wrote the following feedback:
It is important to consider the fact that Ken Ham was not debating but lecturing. When lecturing, people tend to use various methods of communication to get their points across and make the audience think about what is being said. In an official debate, the debaters make formal statements, but in a lecture-type setting, we can expect communication devices like rhetorical questions, allegories, and even reification.
The key item we need to recognize when applying these logical fallacies in the real world is that they are mainly applied in formal debates and formal writing. Moreover, if we applied these fallacies like reification to everyday language, we would see people making many “logical fallacies,” and communication would become boring and dull. Nonetheless, we should still avoid allegorical or poetic language when making concluding statements about debatable topics—just to make sure we are clearly explaining our point.
Read the full response to this question on our website.
News to Note Quick Look
Bible-believing Christians need not apply: A British couple have been denied the privilege of caring for foster children because they hold biblical views on homosexuality. Read more.
Network with Us!
Note: Facebook and Twitter are both social networking sites with user-contributed content. Children should not visit the sites without parental supervision.
This Week . . .
View the current prayer requests to keep track of and pray for current ministry needs.
Please do not reply to this email. If you need help or have a question, please visit our help area.
This message was sent to you at %%$email%% because you signed up online, at an event, or through a promotional offer of the Creation Museum or Answers in Genesis. Please add email@example.com to your address book to ensure our emails reach your inbox.
Answers in Genesis