In this issue . . .
Q: Where are all the bunny fossils?
My friend asked me this question “find me a fossilised bunny in the cambrian or any equivalent...just one. thats all you would need.’
What would be a good response to that.
—M.L., San Clemente, California
A: Thank you for passing along your friend’s question. So, where are all the bunny fossils? At first, it appears to be a riddle for creationists. The implication behind the question is that, if the fossil record isn’t an accurate record of millions of years of evolution, then why is there a neat order to it? If most of the fossil record was laid down all at once by the global Flood, then why are rabbits found only in “recent” Tertiary and Quaternary sediments rather than in the sediments belonging to the “ancient” Cambrian period?
First, we must look at the very validity of the geologic column. Is there actually a definable Cambrian period that exists in the sedimentary layers, independent of uniformitarian and evolutionary presuppositions? What we find is that the geological column is not nearly as straightforward as evolutionists suggest. For one thing, nowhere on earth is the entire fossil record visible. The schema is pieced together by correlating exposed rock layers from around the globe. So, it represents a composite picture, not an exact sequence that covers the globe. Radiometric dating and other evolutionary presuppositions are then applied to the composite column.
Instead, we see a tendency toward order. For example, when found at the same sites, marine fossils are generally in sedimentary layers well below dinosaur fossils. However, even this fact can be deceiving, because we don’t often find different kinds of fossils together. An incredible 95 percent of the fossils we find are of shallow marine organisms, like corals and shellfish—and sometimes we find those even in high sedimentary layers, even on top of Mt. Everest! The next 4.75 percent are fossils of algae, plants, and invertebrates (such as insects). That leaves only a quarter of one percent (0.25) of all fossils that are of vertebrates. But an incredible 99 percent of these fossils are only a single bone!
Continue learning how a global Flood explains the fossil record in Feedback: Where Are All the Bunny Fossils?
Help Us Out!
Can you donate a few minutes of your time to help us improve AnswersInGenesis.org? We have created a brief eight-question survey to help us stay aware of what material readers are using, what new site features you would like to see, etc.
To complete the survey, visit Answers in Genesis Reader Survey. Thank you for your time!
News to Note Quick Look
Toeing the old-age line: A fossilized footprint found in Kenya—thought to be 1.5 million years old—doesn’t look its age. Read more.
The slow-and-gradual catastrophe: An ancient extinction wasn’t as sudden and catastrophic as once believed. Now, how does that reinforce the Flood model? Read more.
Also: paleontology isn’t brain surgery; maybe, maybe, maybe; praise him?; unhelpful terms; proving design; and don’t miss . . . . Read more.
View the current prayer requests to keep track of and pray for current ministry needs. Thank you!
This Week . . .
Video On Demand
This message was sent because you signed up online, at an event, or through a promotional offer of the Creation Museum or Answers in Genesis. Please add email@example.com to your address book to ensure our emails reach your inbox. If you would like to opt out from receiving any further Answers Weekly email newsletters, you may unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from all Answers in Genesis email correspondence, email firstname.lastname@example.org.
Answers in Genesis
© Copyright 2009 Answers in Genesis | All rights reserved.