The Big Bang is a naturalistic story about the origin and development of the universe, beginning with a “singularity” when all mass, energy, and space was contained in a small point. It is riddled with problems and, most importantly, contradicts the biblical teaching of creation.
Many believers try harmonizing the Bible’s account of supernatural creation with the big bang’s naturalistic story of the universe’s origins. Can both be true?
Does observational science support the big bang, the idea that 13 billion years ago all matter came from nothing and eventually formed everything we see today?
The “big bang” story aims to explain the universe’s origin without God and simultaneously fails to align with either the Bible & established scientific findings.
How did this universe come into existence? Did God use “natural” methods to create the universe, or did He create everything supernaturally?
The big bang model has proven to be quite pliable, morphing to adapt to each new problem. Are these changes true improvements or rescuing devices?
It’s often been said in cosmology circles that data should never get in the way of a good model.
A reader questions our claim that the big bang is an attempt to explain the universe without God. Dr. Jason Lisle, AiG–U.S., responds.
Once again, a key part of the naturalistic origins story is failing because it’s not confirmed by observational evidence.
The light-travel–time argument cannot be used to reject the Bible in favour of the big bang, with its billions of years. This is because the big bang model also has a light-travel–time problem.
Will studies revealing a quasar with a much-too-massive black hole and a galaxy with young space dust lead to the downfall of the big bang model?
Answers in Genesis is an apologetics ministry, dedicated to helping Christians defend their faith and proclaim the good news of Jesus Christ.