Responding to Compromised Curriculum

People who deny biblical creation often claim that as long as Christians affirm the doctrines that are essential for salvation, we should not be divisive over secondary issues, and place creation firmly in the “secondary” category. The theistic evolutionists at BioLogos, for example, show that far from only affecting “minor, secondary” doctrines, their view requires radical reinterpretation of the creation narrative, including the loss of the historical Adam, historical Fall, and global Flood of Noah’s day. In such attempts to reconcile the Bible and evolution, no biblical doctrine goes unscathed.

Articles About Responding to Compromised Curriculum

• Misguided God of the Gaps

  

  Sept. 24, 2021

  Curricula like Integrate accuse biblical creationists of appealing to a “God of the gaps”—yet this charge often forgets humanity’s smallness and the universe’s complexity.

• Human Wisdom: Something to Suspect?

  

  Sept. 15, 2021

  BioLogos' Integrate curriculum critiques young earth creation with logical fallacies and fails to distinguish between historical and operational sciences.

• Is Historical Science Useful?

  

  July 16, 2021

  Theistic evolutionary curriculum Integrate fails to distinguish between empirical and historical science & how worldview affects our entire perspective.

• Should Christians Trust Scientific Experts?

  

  June 15, 2021

  BioLogos has written a curriculum named Integrate and has been republishing articles on their website in support of and defense of it.

• Right or Wrong in the Creation/Evolution Debate

  

  June 1, 2021

  In the creation/evolution debate, only one group can be right—Biologos & their Integrate curriculum oppose the plain reading of Genesis.